See the work. Understand its limits.

Public research artifacts, reproducibility packages, and methods from TAI Creative. Controlled demonstrations are distinct from customer findings and production-security outcomes.

Explore public methods, research artifacts, and experimental questions. Controlled demonstrations and research results are distinct from customer findings and production-security outcomes.

Defined scope. Clear boundaries. Our offered assessments are passive or offline and report-only. Live scanning and exploitation are outside this scope. Controlled demonstrations are distinct from production findings; live quantum hardware requires separate written authorization.

Start with the source.

Reproducibility package

Sanitized paper source, code, data, tests, and generated figures. Inspect the package’s methods, assumptions, and limitations.

Open GitHub package ↗

DOI-backed archive

A versioned research artifact that technical readers can inspect and cite. An archived package is not independent validation of a customer outcome.

Open Zenodo archive ↗

Submission state

As of July 1, 2026, the submission had started and was awaiting quant-ph endorsement. This is a dated status, not a claim of publication or endorsement.

Measured, modeled, and still open.

Research Lab

Inspect optimization, routing, scheduling, and hardware-readiness questions. Each experiment should be understood in its stated context.

Explore the Lab →

Quantum security

Simulator demonstrations explain attack mechanisms on representative material. They do not demonstrate a break of production keys.

View assessment methods →

Hardware access has its own gates.

Azure Quantum and AWS Braket pathways support provider routing. Internal validation circuits are separate from customer work. Live-QPU milestones require a signed addendum and written provider authorization; sensitive provider metadata is kept private.